Candidate scorecard

Category: People
Built with: Gemini
Purpose: Interview feedback and recommendation in a clean shareable format.

---

Executive summary

This saved.md artifact turns raw working notes into a page that can be skimmed in under three minutes. It leads with the point, makes the evidence visible, and ends with the decisions or asks that move the work forward.

Highlights

• Momentum: The core narrative is clear enough to forward without extra explanation.
• Evidence: Metrics and qualitative notes are grouped into a clean decision trail.
• Next action: Owners, asks, and open questions are explicit instead of buried.

Metric pulse

Main readout

Wins

1. The story is condensed into a board-, investor-, client-, or team-ready format.
2. The important details are preserved without making the page feel like a document dump.
3. The reader can see what happened, why it matters, and what comes next.

Risks

• Ambiguous ownership can slow follow-up.
• Overloading the page with raw notes would dilute the point.
• Metrics need interpretation, not just display.

Recommended next step

Create one follow-up loop: owner, deadline, decision needed, and proof required. The artifact should become the reference point for that loop.

Prompt included

“Use these interview notes to generate a balanced hiring recommendation page with strengths, concerns, and a final call.”

---

Curated saved.md launch-style example. Fictional data used to demonstrate the format.